Publicar con integridad. La ética como fundamento del conocimiento científico

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47058/joa15.1

Palabras clave:

Editorial

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A. y Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. mBio, 7(3), e00809-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00809-16

Brainard, J. y You, J. (2018). What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's 'death penalty'. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty

Committee on Publication Ethics [COPE]. (2023). Authorship and AI tools. COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

Declaración de San Francisco sobre la Evaluación de la Investigación [DORA]. (2012). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. https://sfdora.org/read/

Else, H. y Van Noorden, R. (2021). The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science. Nature, 591(7851), 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00733-5

Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738

Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G. y Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109

Gopalakrishna, G., ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M. y Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors. A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 17(2), e0263023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023, a new record. Nature, 624(7992), 479–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8

World Conference on Research Integrity. (2010). Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. https://www.wcrif.org/guidance/singapore-statement

Publicado

2026-10-13

Número

Sección

Presentación

Cómo citar

Publicar con integridad. La ética como fundamento del conocimiento científico. (2026). Journal of the Academy, 15, 2-6. https://doi.org/10.47058/joa15.1